CLOWARD AND PIVEN PLUS ONE

For a long time I thought the Democrats were desperately trying to implement the Cloward and Piven strategy: "overwhelm the welfare system and establish a guaranteed annual income", and I thought, that Bill Clinton tried to make some addtional inroads, when he "assigned" Hilary to develop a "National Health Care" program, which was eventually rejected by the citizens. The way it was presented by Hilary was too obvious. But the Obama administration was going to "one up this strategy" by creating and imposing his version of "an affordable healthcare program"; a medical insurance plan called Obamacare; a system impossible to succeed BUT the fail-safe was written into the law to bail out the medical insurance companies when the citizens and the program, eventually failed at the end of 2014. So that we would all believe his version was actually going to be successful.

But, this would be an even greater example of the Cloward and Piven strategy of collapsing not only the welfare system but now a new system which represented 1/6th of the budget of the USA., in order to have the Federal government take it over. The administration would then offer the solution to the problem of the insurance companies not being able to cover all the medical costs, by telling the people that because of the insurance companies, the Obamacare law cannot succeed and America therefore, has to revert to a single payer system of medical insurance for every American. This means the Federal Government will pay for all health care costs. The term "single-payer" thus only describes the funding mechanism—referring to health care financed by a single public body from a single fund—and does not specify the type of delivery, or for whom doctors work. Therein lies the dictatorial aspect of the single payer system.

Canada, Cuba, Venezuela, England are just a few of the countries that have a single payer system, and all of them are either limiting the kind of coverage a person can get, or limiting the people who can get the coverage, or whose government, through what has been called in America a "death panel", determines who can and cannot receive any sort of medical treatment. No person nor a doctor in any of these countries can decide what is the best treatment and who can receive that treatment; the Government does all that for you.

When that type of system does happen, you are led to believe is it "free healthcare coverage" but it is far from free.

Our Federal Government has been successful in duping Americans through payroll deductions by stealing from every citizen out of their weekly paycheck, and redistributing that money as it sees fit. It is kind of like what Unions do; they take their "dues" out of your paycheck to "make it easier for you to pay". The Federal Government, takes "dues" out of your weekly paycheck to pay for the programs it decides are necessary for you. And like Unions, the person least likely to work, receives all the benefits as someone who works hard for their income. You work harder, but you only get the same raise the other non-working slug gets, and the same vacation time and the same Holidays. With the Federal Government, it takes your hard earned money, and distributes it to people who do not want to work; who do not want to pay for their own medical costs, people who are encouraged to continue to be lazy, increase the size of a family, fully expecting you and me to pay for it.

Obamacare was never intended to be a success; it was implemented by Progressives who want to take control of the every day life of each American citizen; it was designed to fail, and it will. the successful failure of this program will make America just another country run by a dictator and his assigned cohorts. You can see Obama's intentions in his desire to write "executive orders", willy-nilly. We have a Constitution Obama wants to disregard, and the failure of his signature legislation will enable him to further his dictatorial desires. We can't allow the Cloward and Piven type of thinkers, succeed. We have to return the power of this country to the people which this Republic was designed to be governed by.

It is up the voting citizens of America to educate themselves and to vote accordingly with the intention of getting rid of the "Lifer" politician; those white haird dinosaurs who need to go home. Those cotton-top politicians are so obsessed with themselves and so out of touch with the citizens they just need to be replaced, in both parties.

We have a chance to do that this November. Choose you, whom you will vote for, but make certain it is not a vote to retain the senior citizen in the House of Representatives or the Senate. You have a chance to stop the Cloward and Piven kind of thinking that has permeated the DC Elites for a very long time. 2014 can be the year America was restored to her glory, because of your vote. And I might add, flushing the toilet in DC will get rid of all the waste that has resided there for 40 years..

IS CALIFORNIA A FOREIGN COUNTRY

"Citing a new state law allowing illegal immigrants to get their law licenses, the California Supreme Court on Thursday paved the way for a Chico man to fulfill his dream of becoming an attorney despite his not being a U.S. citizen.
In a unanimous ruling, the state Supreme Court determined there is no reason to block Sergio Garcia's bid for a California law license, now that a new law permits the state's high court to give such licenses to immigrants who are not yet citizens. State legislators, backed by Gov. Jerry Brown, pushed the legislation last fall as Garcia's case was unfolding in the Supreme Court.

Citing a new state law allowing illegal immigrants to get their law licenses, the California Supreme Court on Thursday paved the way for a Chico man to fulfill his dream of becoming an attorney despite his not being a U.S. citizen.
In a unanimous ruling, the state Supreme Court determined there is no reason to block Sergio Garcia's bid for a California law license, now that a new law permits the state's high court to give such licenses to immigrants who are not yet citizens. State legislators, backed by Gov. Jerry Brown, pushed the legislation last fall as Garcia's case was unfolding in the Supreme Court".






This is part of an article from the Drudge Report about an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT (that used to mean someone has broken the law for immigration and is not allowed to reside in the USA, just like it is in his own country).


Think about this; natural born citizens are often denied the opportunity to obtain a law license because of a criminal record, but in California, they want to allow criminals to legally practice law, and maybe run for political office, since a large number of politicians were first, lawyers.

We often heard of the cliche of the "fox running the hen house", well, how about criminals representing criminals in the legal system? (well, maybe that happens more often than I think).

What has happened to this country and the way people think? We boast about it being a country managed by the rule of law, then we change that very law, for no good reason, and we end up with chaos. We have a Progressive president violating the Constitution almost on a daily basis; we have the Justice department not prosecuting the IRS, NSA, or even Black Panthers who threaten voters outside of the voting station. We have an American ambassador and others who tried to protect him, getting killed with the State Department saying it was caused by a video and, "what difference does it make now, anyway"; the president crams a "health insurance" law down our throats, then resists offers to defer its implementation for a year, to only change that very law more than 14 times without going through the Congress (no one has a right to change a law without Congressional approval).  Within that health insurance law, taxes were raised and created (your monthly premium will have a tax placed upon it to add to the cost of the premium), and tax payers money will be given to Acorn and other groups to further the Progressive agenda, and not a single American citizen is protesting any of this.

More will happen because you are all so complacent. The Bolshevik revolution was won by not firing a single shot, and renamed part of Europe the USSR, and it is the same thing that is happening in the USA. Perhaps we ought to rename the country to USSP (united state of socialist progressives), and while not throw out the Constitution, allow it to be rewritten on a daily basis by state Supreme Courts or just by Presidential Fiat.

Do you know, you do not have to be a lawyer to be appointed to the US Supreme Court? An illegal alien licensed to legally practice law in America.......how did that ever become something acceptable? Can such a person end up on the US Supreme Court, OR, maybe, even President.

THE AMERICAN INDIAN; AN EXAMPLE FOR BLACKS TO LEARN FROM

Oh how nice of the Federal Government to march all those Indians into Reservation areas so they can live happily ever after, right?
Well, American Indians have the highest rate of unemployment, one of the highest rates of alcoholism, poverty and are one of the least medically uninsured group of people in America.

Only recently have they been able to make inroads into their own self-sufficiency, and that is not true of every tribe that exists. American Indians have been treated like they are a parasite or are an anethema to American beliefs, yet it is the American politicians that have put them in their current position and causes them to stay in it. The American Indian is not allowed the same benefits as are the rest of Americans simply because they are the property of the Federal Government.

Fast forward to the 21st century and you can see how similar the politicians treat the black people of this nation. The main difference is that the black people do not have to stay on a reservation in some of the remotest land of this nation and try to eke out a living. No, instead, the black people are held in such low esteem, politicians think it is necessary to keep them on welfare, food stamps, limited education, and in government housing. Oh sure, you can make a case for their being exceptions, but the idea here is that the Federal government has suppressed both of these groups of Americans, keeping them out of the "normal" aspects of our societies, and passing legislation that on the surface sounds good FOR them, but in reality, maintains their dependence upon government. Neither group has the same opportunities the rest of us have to jobs, promotions, housing, neighborhoods, respectful living, and especially self esteem. The Federal Government makes those arrangements through legislation designed just for those groups; lately, only for the black group of people.

All of the legislation made "for the black group of people" only strangles them further, and keeps them separate from the rest of the groups. Even immigrant Chinese or Irish or Vietnamese have better access to the full notion of the American Dream, while American Indians and the black people are still struggling, just to be recognized as American citizens. The Federal Government does all it can to divide this nation and keep it divided in order for politicians to get in and stay in power. Notice, none of them, black, white, or any other color, are as bad off as the rest of us. In fact, most politicians become very wealthy after getting into office, all the while passing laws that continue to keep us divided and suppressed.

The American Indian is finally getting some of their people educated enough to bring back to their tribes, business options, employment and better individual housing. More, much more has to be done, but they are trying to rise above it all. I am afraid, the black group of people still heavily rely on the Federal Government. Many blacks have made great inroads in their own personal lives, but don't seem to be affective in helping the rest to make enormous breakthroughs.

Immigration once meant assimilation; today, because of politicians, we are a much more divided nation than ever before. After getting rid of Ellis Island, that place where immigrants were allowed to enter into this country, after first proving they were healthy and had a sponsor, so we could control the numbers that were coming here and be certain they didn't bring disease with them, politicians began to label this nation as multi-cultural. America may be a melting pot, but it was never multi-cultural; we were and should still be "one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all". POLITICIANS are the guilty ones who keep us fighting against each other, with laws meant to do just that.

People, it is time we stop all the bickering about black, white, red, or yellow. As a nation, we need to protect OUR borders, and make certain miscreants do not enter to do us all harm. We need to quickly unite as Americans and take this country back from the politicians who legislate us into cultures or groups, as if we are supposed to be treated differently than the next guy. Sure, we have different backgrounds, but we are all Americans and need to stop the in-fighting the politicians legislate into or society.

It's Christmas, and no matter your religion, it is a good time to gather together and take the first step to unite us all as Americans (no color label before or after) we are Americans  period, end of story!!

SOTUS, Rubio, Rand, Carson and GOD

What a speech. Did you watch it? I didn't! Obama's ideas make me nauseous. I didn't watch Marco Rubio either, but it sounds like a lot of people didn't like what he had to say and others mocked him for his "performance". Drinking water became the bigger issue, rather than what he had to say. Ah, no matter. He seems to be being mentored by the establishment, anyway. He used to be the "darling conservative", but his star has lost its luster. Rubio would have to get back to his "roots" where the Tea Party (American citizens) is, and I'm not certain he wants to associate himself with the taxpayers of the nation, rather than the "ideologues" with all the money. Since his becoming one of the "8", and now this uncomfortable SOTUS rebuttal, he seems destined to become of the hopefuls that have not been able to persevere.

I want to watch the possible career of Ben Carson. You know, the neurosurgeon who spoke his mind, in front of Obama. He is retiring soon, and just might start a career in politics, although I would suggest he make a run for the Presidency. The problem there is, he doesn't have any idea what kind of cabinet he could make. It is doubtful he knows enough people wanting to or able to fill a cabinet, let alone all of those alphabetical agencies the socialist government has created. Lacking that, he would have to defer to the establishment, which is what Ronald Reagan did in his second term and it became the trailer to his otherwise brilliant career.

Rand Paul has just reached out in a way that might quicken the religious people of this nation into action. He has asked for prayer, and he has admitted this country needs a revival. Ecumenicalism is a problem for Reformed Protestants; it might not be so for Catholics or the rest of the religious organizations, including Islam. The Reformed believers make up a small portion of the religious people in America, BUT they are the most involved, individuals. They are not reluctant to part with their money, but they are selective and are not easily duped; thus it is hard to get them to "cough up", but just as Reed found out, they are willing, given the right person, with the right heart. However, Ecumenicalism is NOT something they espouse; primarily because Ecumenicalism includes anyone and everyone who believes in Jesus Christ. Well, Scriptures tell us that even the Devils believe, so Reformed Protestants do not want to be associated with anyone who cannot separate themselves, religiously from the enemies of God.

I don't know of Rand Paul's religious beliefs, but if he is true to God and His Scriptures, he will reveal himself, in time. If his timing and desires are from God, they will be met with great enthusiasm; if not .....

Ben Carson "seems" to be of the religious sort, but that has to be flushed out, afterall, John Kerry and John Kennedy (both JK) laid claim to religiousity, but just not the norm for America. Kennedy got away with it because the time was different and many of the voters held to their Catholic associations, "even if the man was a scoundrel, at least he was a Catholic".

Ben Carson hasn't been "vetted" yet by the socialist media; and when they get done with him, he had better have more than just an inkling towards God. If Ben Carson cannot rebuke the media in a religious fashion, he will become a has been before he gets started. However, if he is not afraid of his love for God and His Word, then let the battle begin. The "religious right" are willing to fight, if they have a leader. They are not afraid of what they stand for, because they know the battle is the Lord's; they are merely the instruments He is using. If this is Ben Carson's notion, even if he could lose a political battle that is prematurely rigged, he will perform well and expose those God wants exposed.

This nation may be at its intended decline. God might have let us "play act" long enough. But, for the Reformed, GOD IS IN CONTROL, even when the likes of Obama seem to have the "upper hand". Surely you remember the story of the Egyptian Pharoah, and how he kept the Hebrew nation captive, until a stuttering man, used by God led the Hebrew nation out of Egypt with all of Egypt's wealth?

We can know what is the will of God, by reading His Word, but sinners have a tendency of perverting what it is God has said. We have a tendency of molding God into the image we want Him to have; so when He is present, we are unable to see or worse yet, to recognize Him; but that doesn't stop Him from doing His will.

Obama is on the campaign trail again, hoping to capitalize on the issues to the extent he can get more Democrats elected into the House of Representatives so they will have the majority. And we know, he doesn't need Democrats to achieve that; if he helps to get moderate Republicans elected like Scott Brown from Massachusetts, he will accomplish the same thing. That is of course, if the Democrats can hold onto the Senate. This is where God comes in. Folks, 2 years before the Presidential election, we will know what will become of this nation; once a Godly Christian country. I suspect, if the House and the Senate are controlled by the Democrats, Obama will become the "king" this nation is looking for. The two chambers will by-pass the Constitution and declare it unanimous that Obama stay on indefinitely as President. Needless to say, IF that occurs, it will not be long before this nation is over-run and militarily destroyed.....once again, unless God has other plans. 

My final remark on this whole issue is, GOD IS IN CONTROL, and the battle is His.

NO DOUBLE STANDARD ?

One of the most revealing statements made by Hilary Clinton during her Congressional hearing was, "what does it matter", when asked if she could shine some light on whether or not those people who attacked the Consulate in Benghazi were merely demonstrators or was that event actually a military style attack by El Queda terrorists. "What does it matter...." ?

It has always been accepted as an attack on sovereign soil of the nation itself, if there were ever an attack on the diplomatic Consulate of the Ambassador allowed to be in a specific country. An attack on the American Consulate in Bengahzi is considered an attack on America. So, it matters who did what, and for the Secretary of the State to treat the killing of Americans who were sent as diplomats to Lybia as nothing, is appalling and disgusting. She should have been removed from her position for being too stupid to know what was going on, in the first place.

However, my more poignant point is this: if Democrats can treat this murder as a matter that gives the Secretary of State AND our President, little pause, why don't they also treat slavery as a past matter that doesn't need to be regurgitated? Why is the killing of an American Ambassador and the military people who tried to protect him of such little concern to the Secretary of State, yet when she was campaigning for the Democratic nod for the Presidency, she went to black communities, talking jibe, and trying to sound early southern, as if trying to reach the hearts of those who were wrongly affected by the ills of a new country? She wanted to "relate" to "them". Why doesn't the Secretary of State, relate to the Americans surviving those being killed under her watch? Were they the wrong nationality? Were they unable to help her in her future political career? Help me understand why she, and the rest of the Democrats who seem unable to find fault with her actions, should not be brought up on charges for negligence of duty, gross irresponsibility, neglecting the requests of the Ambassador whose life was then taken, because of her inaction?

If a Republican candidate said something like "kabooki", the news media would go all out to slander the man and ruin his career, looking into what language the remark might offend, even when the remark was just a simple gobbledegook to make a point. But let diplomatic Americans be raped, tortured and killed at the hands of a known enemy, and nothing is said; worse, the person responsible for making certain something like that doesn't occur, has oozing accolades poured on her, adnauseum.

People, our system is broken! I mean it is broken, bad, when this sort of thing occurs by the people who are supposed to defend our Constitution and our Country.

The future of America, looks very dim, when the Secretary of State can "get away" with not doing her job to the extent people got killed because of her negligence and then her party (elected officials) defend her. I can't say it more strongly............our system is broken and needs to be fixed or changed.

The President who appointed her to office is no less culpable because he has had an innocent man arrested, prosecuted and put in jail for 1 year, for false allegations made by the State Department, and the President himself, accusing that man of inciting the riot on the Embassy that they knew was false and was actually an attack by ElQueda on the Embassy; and for this to happen; for a man to go to jail charged with a crime he didn't commit; for the President to repeatedly assert on national TV that this man was at fault cannot be overlooked. This President and his appointees, deliberately lied to the American people, pointed the blame somewhere else, and do not be fooled......this can happen to you.

Not too long ago, the Congress and the President signed into law, a bill that states an American citizen can be arrested, not charged with a crime, and whisked away to an unknown location for an indefinite period of time. This man was openly accused of something he was not responsible for, but I'm telling you, those politicians you elected have made it so, no charges have to be leveled. You can be whisked away during the night without the opportunity of charges or a defense. No lawyers will be provided, and no one will know where they have taken you; this by the people who have sworn to defend the Constitution Article 1 section 9..."The writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless in cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public safety may require it".

Executive Orders has been another way Presidents have violated the Constitution, but the surprising thing is no single politician has brought charges against any administration that does so;  the system is broken, bad.

The Tea Party has been a real threat to both political parties because those parties can see their power and elitism being taken away from them, by the actions of grass-root people, who understand the system is broken and want it restored. Both parties will lose when the American citizens win. But every effort is being made to demean the "Tea Party" people; to treat them as terrorists (which is how they will get arrested as I've outlined above); the system is broken.

I don't know where he is, and I can only expect either God will provide such a person to step forward so the American people can rally behind him, OR it is Gods plan for the demise and destruction of a nation that has turned its back on Him, first. If the latter is the case, then soon we shall see the Armageddon so many religions talk about, even the religion of Islam is looking for their Imam and Messiah to come, but according to their beliefs, that can only happen if and when the world is in chaos. How far do you think we are from that occurring? Do you think American politicians are playing a part in this, whether knowingly or not? Does it look possible that what is happening in the Middle East, can happen here?

Hey, "what does it matter"? Just as long as we move forward, right?