I thought I was reading the CNN news report. There it is for all the world to see; a picture, a name and the country he was sent to AFTER he cooperated with the military at Guantanamo, indicating 123 detainees' part in terror plots and activities.
How insane are these reporters today? Once upon a time, they would go to jail instead of revealing a source, today they write a biography of a man who helped his enemies.
David Leigh will have blood on his hands when we hear or read about the death of the man he wrote about on April 25, 2011. It is no secret, Islam terrorists make examples of people who cooperate or aid their enemy by unmercilessly murdering or butchering them and their family. Beheading them would be to merciful a death.
David Leigh is the new kind of reporter papers produce today. They are intent on a scoop, and care little about protecting the identity of the person whom they write about. It is also the reason so many newspapers are going belly-up. If it isn't one-sided trash they write about, then it's the full disclosure of an asset they feel compelled to expose. How stupid is that?! It would seem to me that in a short time, fewer and fewer people would want to help a reporter. What kind of thinking goes on in the mind of that kind of reporting?
Yeah, I'm going on and on, but it just alludes me: why would a man want to expose in detail, his source in a story that has world wide attention? And why would the papers' Editor, let it be written?
Am I alone out here?
How insane are these reporters today? Once upon a time, they would go to jail instead of revealing a source, today they write a biography of a man who helped his enemies.
David Leigh will have blood on his hands when we hear or read about the death of the man he wrote about on April 25, 2011. It is no secret, Islam terrorists make examples of people who cooperate or aid their enemy by unmercilessly murdering or butchering them and their family. Beheading them would be to merciful a death.
David Leigh is the new kind of reporter papers produce today. They are intent on a scoop, and care little about protecting the identity of the person whom they write about. It is also the reason so many newspapers are going belly-up. If it isn't one-sided trash they write about, then it's the full disclosure of an asset they feel compelled to expose. How stupid is that?! It would seem to me that in a short time, fewer and fewer people would want to help a reporter. What kind of thinking goes on in the mind of that kind of reporting?
Yeah, I'm going on and on, but it just alludes me: why would a man want to expose in detail, his source in a story that has world wide attention? And why would the papers' Editor, let it be written?
Am I alone out here?
No comments:
Post a Comment